Use case · Government procurement
Check a Chinese Supplier’s Government Procurement Evidence
Procurement awards can show a supplier’s recorded activity with public buyers. They are a useful trail to investigate—not a certificate of successful delivery.
Remote MCP is a Streamable HTTP endpoint for client configuration, not a browser search form.
Read an award as a recorded event, not a performance verdict
China government procurement records can help an agent examine reported buyer relationships, bid awards and tender history. Chinese supplier contract awards may identify an announcement, date, buyer or amount when those fields exist in the source. Missing fields should remain missing.
Awards are not proof of contract performance. An award does not establish delivery quality, acceptance, payment completion or the absence of a later dispute. Verify those separately before treating a supplier as proven.
- Confirm the legal company first. Similar names in a procurement announcement are not enough to attribute an award automatically.
- Inspect procurement summaries alongside
linkageanddataset_coverage. The currently documented procurement source is Beijing award data, not every China tender. - When a decision needs supporting records, request Full and preserve
content_id, announcement or lot identifiers andsource_fileswhen present. These traceable sources help a reviewer locate the underlying material.
For supplier due diligence, an aggregate award count is a screening signal. Procurement evidence should retain the original source context rather than become an unsupported “performed successfully” label.
Choose evidence depth for this task
| Tool | Price | When to use it |
|---|---|---|
resolve_china_company | Free | Resolve the company name and inspect ambiguity first; obtain the intended USCC before using paid tools when multiple candidates remain. |
get_china_supplier_evidence_basic | Basic $0.002 USDC | Choose Basic to screen procurement activity and linkage before deciding whether to investigate. It returns summaries and coverage, not detailed award rows. |
get_china_supplier_evidence_full | Full $0.01 USDC | Choose Full for detailed evidence rows available in configured datasets. Check total_items, returned_items and truncated; evidence_limit can restrict your view, so a short report is not every available record. |
No signup. No API key. No prepaid account. x402 · Base USDC. Paid calls still require a compatible funded wallet and explicit spending authorization.
For Full, include_evidence defaults to true; evidence_limit is an integer from 0 to 100. Available rows depend on source coverage; check evidence_meta rather than assuming completeness.
Example structure, not live facts
Example structure: provenance-only projection of an existing public static procurement sample. This is not a live query, a new award, or a claim about any company. It intentionally omits buyer, amount and company facts.
{
"type": "PROCUREMENT_AWARD",
"source": "Beijing Government Data Open Platform",
"dataset": "北京市财政局-中标公告",
"content_id": "19201",
"checked_at": "2026-09-08T19:30:41Z"
}
Static example / not_live_query. This is a schema excerpt or field projection, not a complete success response or evidence of any supplier’s current state.
Inspect the original free static example · Inspect the complete schema
Keep source scope attached to the conclusion
Results are limited to configured official/open datasets and must not be interpreted as nationwide completeness. No procurement record found is not proof of no awards elsewhere. A content_id locates the dataset; preserve finer announcement/record locators when available. x402 pay-per-call lets an agent request detail for the cases that need it, with spending authorization—not a prepaid account.
Results are limited to configured official/open datasets and must not be interpreted as nationwide completeness.
Use the existing service
Remote MCP: https://cn-evidence-mcp-public.mikeyang7789.workers.dev/mcp