Use case · Regulatory evidence
Review Regulatory Evidence Before Approving a Chinese Supplier
Keep regulatory records, source scope and interpretation separate. An agent needs evidence it can inspect—not a risk label inferred from a name match.
Remote MCP is a Streamable HTTP endpoint for client configuration, not a browser search form.
Distinguish regulatory history from a current compliance decision
Chinese company regulatory history can identify questions for supplier compliance review. Administrative penalties are one type of regulatory evidence; broader datasets may contain abnormal-operation workflow records that are not penalty decisions. Inspect the record type and disposition before applying vendor due diligence rules.
A historical penalty record does not automatically mean a supplier is currently unqualified. A historical workflow entry may not even confirm a negative finding. Keep dates, linkage and current-status uncertainty separate.
- Resolve company identity before associating a record with the supplier. Same-name matches without sufficient linkage should remain unresolved.
- Read the source evidence with its dataset locator,
checked_at, disposition and source-specific fields. Preserve the issuing authority and decision reference when actually present; do not manufacture them. - Apply your own approval policy to confirmed facts. Seek current authoritative records or human review when the evidence is ambiguous, old or outside coverage.
This independent aggregation service is not a government-operated API. It reports available evidence from configured official/open sources; it does not automatically label a company “high risk” or issue compliance clearance.
Choose evidence depth for this task
| Tool | Price | When to use it |
|---|---|---|
resolve_china_company | Free | Resolve the company name and inspect ambiguity first; obtain the intended USCC before using paid tools when multiple candidates remain. |
get_china_supplier_evidence_basic | Basic $0.002 USDC | Use Basic to identify whether the configured regulatory summaries and linkage justify further review. Zero confirmed records is not nationwide clearance. |
get_china_supplier_evidence_full | Full $0.01 USDC | Use Full when reviewers need detailed regulatory evidence rows and provenance. Available records can include broader regulatory history, not necessarily a penalty; read type and disposition rather than treating every row as negative. |
No signup. No API key. No prepaid account. x402 · Base USDC. Paid calls still require a compatible funded wallet and explicit spending authorization.
For Full, include_evidence defaults to true; evidence_limit is an integer from 0 to 100. Available rows depend on source coverage; check evidence_meta rather than assuming completeness.
Example structure, not live facts
Example structure: projection of the existing static regulatory-history sample, with all company-specific fields removed. NOT_ENTERED is explicitly not a current abnormal-listing or penalty claim. This is not a live query.
{
"type": "ABNORMAL_OPERATION_DATASET_RECORD",
"source": "Shenzhen Government Open Data",
"dataset": "经营异常名录",
"dataset_id": "1137936299",
"checked_at": "2026-09-08T19:30:41Z",
"record_disposition": "NOT_ENTERED",
"indicates_abnormal_listing": false,
"negative_signal": false,
"current_status_confirmed": false
}Static example / not_live_query. This is a schema excerpt or field projection, not a complete success response or evidence of any supplier’s current state.
Inspect the original free static example · Inspect the complete schema
Keep source scope attached to the conclusion
Results are limited to configured official/open datasets and must not be interpreted as nationwide completeness. The documented regional datasets do not establish a national regulatory record for a supplier. A checked_at timestamp is not proof that the source record was updated then. Preserve UNKNOWN and do not turn historical evidence into an automatic current-risk conclusion.
Results are limited to configured official/open datasets and must not be interpreted as nationwide completeness.
Use the existing service
Remote MCP: https://cn-evidence-mcp-public.mikeyang7789.workers.dev/mcp